Variable nitrogen could prove its worth this spring

Variable-rate nitrogen applications could be a valuable tool for managing uneven growth of winter cereals and oilseeds this spring, says Omnia digital farming manager, Aidan Monaghan.

While some crops sown before the weather broke last October have established well and show good potential, others struggled where seedbeds were compromised, or land suffered prolonged waterlogging or flooding, he says.

When planning nutrition strategies, Mr Monaghan recommends first establishing a baseline for each field and crop.

Omnia users are able to do this by accessing NDVI satellite imagery for any fields saved on the system.

“Satellites pass over frequently, providing a regular supply of new images throughout the year, provided the skies are clear enough. Even images taken when crops are relatively small coming out of winter can provide a useful starting point to show in-field variation before anything starts growing.”

Early mapping could also highlight any areas where crops have been damaged beyond repair and are better being re-sown, rather than receiving any further inputs, he adds.

NDVI maps can be further supported with results from Soil Mineral Nitrogen (SMN) testing, or later in the season, tissue, sap, or in-field chlorophyl tests. “It all helps build a picture of crop health and nitrogen requirements throughout the season.”

There are different approaches to variable nitrogen, depending on the requirements of individual crops and field situations.

The traditional approach in winter wheat is often to variably apply the first couple of doses, upping rates on thinner areas of crop to build biomass, while cutting rates on thicker parts, to generate more even canopies.

However, because residual nitrogen levels this spring are likely to be lower than normal after the wet winter, which will have increased leaching losses, Mr Monaghan feels most fields will benefit from a good early nitrogen dose to get crops moving.

“The best approach might therefore be to apply a flat rate first, then vary the second application to even crops up, before tailoring the final nitrogen applications to the yield potential of specific areas of crop.”

Mr Jewers points out that NDVI imagery could be useful this spring for highlighting any areas of crop have that have failed to establish completely, or have been lost to flooding, before fertiliser is applied. Fields should be walked to double-check whether there is any viable crop remaining, and if not, application plans can be set so that no fertiliser is applied to bare areas.

However, saving fertiliser is not the main aim of variable rate applications, he notes. “It’s about using the technology to even-up crop growth through the season, tailoring inputs precisely to crop requirements to optimise yield potential.”

This can bring other management benefits, such as reduced lodging or more even harvesting, and help growers improve overall nitrogen use efficiency (NUE).

“Typically, NUE is around 55-60%, but a good target is 75-80%; any more than that and there is a risk that you’re starting to ‘mine’ the soil’s reserves. Omnia is a really good tool for helping you calculate the NUE for individual fields.”

The approach to variable fertiliser applications may be slightly different in oilseed rape, as crops often receive just two main applications, Mr Monaghan continues. “Providing there’s good establishment, I’d look to even crops up by variably applying the first dose, then adjust the second dose according to expected yield.

“The key is to establish that early baseline, then keep reviewing crops and their yield potential as the season progresses, using the NDVI imagery in Omnia, and any other information, to plan the most appropriate strategy.”