A snapshot of farmer engagement with the Sustainable Farming Incentive – Tillage and Soils
To gauge the level of engagement and perceptions regarding the SFI, a recent survey was conducted through social media by crop production specialists, Hutchinsons ...
To gauge the level of engagement and perceptions regarding the SFI, a recent survey was conducted through social media by crop production specialists, Hutchinsons. The results offer valuable insights into the attitudes of farmers towards the SFI, shedding light on their current engagement with the Sustainable Farming Incentive.
Georgina Wallis, Head of Environmental Services at Hutchinsons, offered insights into the survey findings. She believes the results align with her observations on the ground and urged farmers to seize the quieter periods over the next few weeks to explore the options available through the SFI.
She emphasized the importance of looking beyond initial reservations, particularly in areas where weather conditions have posed challenges to crop survival. Ms Wallis encouraged farmers to view the downtime as an opportunity to assess the potential benefits that the SFI could bring to their farms.
While nearly half of the respondents viewed the SFI as not worthwhile, Ms Wallis urged farmers to revisit their perceptions. She emphasized the flexibility of the SFI, highlighting that amendments can be made over the three-year period, and areas can be adjusted based on farm needs.
Differentiating the SFI from the Countryside Stewardship, she noted the SFI’s adaptability and accessibility, making it particularly beneficial for tenant farmers. To address concerns about the scheme’s requirements, she assured farmers that ample advice is available and encouraged anyone wanting to find out more to visit Hutchinsons at events and shows in the spring to talk to any of the Environmental experts.
“The survey on social media provides valuable insights into farmer engagement with the Sustainable Farming Incentive. While some farmers are actively participating, there is a need to address concerns and misconceptions to encourage broader adoption,” says Georgina Wallis.
Survey results
28% – Applied to the Scheme: A notable portion of respondents, 28%, had already applied to the SFI. This suggests that a substantial number of farmers are actively participating in the SFI. |
44% – Planning to apply but too busy: A significant 44% expressed their intention to apply for the SFI but cited being too busy as a barrier. This highlights the challenges of autumn 2023 and the positive change in scheme engagement which the SFI has bought to the table. |
20% – Viewed as not worthwhile: A concerning 20% of respondents felt that the SFI was not worthwhile. This perception indicates a potential gap in communication or understanding about the benefits and flexibility that the SFI offers. |
8% – Unsure of requirements: A smaller percentage, 8%, admitted to being unsure of the requirements to enter the scheme. This underscores the importance of providing clear and accessible information to farmers to encourage broader participation. |